Skip to main content
Contact Us (816) 421-6868
Dempsey Kingsland Osteen Logo
Contact Us for a Free Consultation (816) 421-6868
  • About Us
    • Leland F. Dempsey
    • Robert D. Kingsland, Jr.
    • Jason P. Osteen
    • Sydney Dowell
    • Diane Plantz, JD, MD
    • Legal Staff
    • Medical Team
    • Mission Statement
  • Practice Areas
    • Medical Malpractice Attorneys In Kansas City
      • Plastic Surgery Malpractice
    • Catastrophic Personal Injury
    • Kansas City Wrongful Death Attorney
  • Case Results
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Topic Focus: Incidental Findings and the Need to Track Them

Nov 19, 2014 | By Dempsey Kingsland Osteen | Read Time: < 1 minutes | Failure to Diagnose

It’s fortunate when an imaging scan picks up an adverse condition that was not on the radar of any health care professional. And once discovered, it’s obviously important to follow through on that so-called “incidental finding.”

Incidental findings, notes a media article on that topic, “are abnormalities discovered unintentionally and not related to the medical condition that prompted the test.”

In other words, you have an MRI following a sports-related head hit indicating, perhaps, a concussion, with the imaging test revealing a brain tumor. Or perhaps a pre-op scan focused on lung health finds a clogged artery.

The central point to be noted upon such a discovery, states the above-cited article on incidental findings, is the importance of any key ancillary finding to be timely and purposefully followed through upon.

Such is not always the case, especially in fast-paced emergency environments. One recent study noted that only about half of all emergency department radiology reports scrutinized in one analysis that discussed an incidental finding and a follow-up recommendation concerning it were subsequently discussed with patients.

That is flatly ominous, given the clear implications for any serious illness or disease that is left untreated.

Some hospitals are getting proactive in their efforts to ensure that, once noted, significant incidental findings stay in focus and are acted upon. One facility stresses interpersonal communication between scanned patients and radiologists, where those parties together examine and discuss images, as well as next steps that might be necessary. Another hospital has instituted a system whereby doctors are electronically reminded to follow through with patients on incidental findings.

The need to do so is great. Reportedly, such findings are seen in as many as 30 percent or more of all imaging tests.

Author Photo
Dempsey Kingsland Osteen

The legal team at Dempsey Kingsland Osteen works to ensure that the injured are fully compensated for their lasting injuries from medical malpractice or other negligence. We push for comprehensive damages that anticipate the long-term needs of our clients, rather than taking a quick settlement out of convenience.

Rate this Post
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading...
Share:
  • Categories

    • Amputations
    • Auto Accident
    • Birth Injuries
    • Brain Injuries
    • Case Results
    • Construction Site Injuries
    • Distracted Driving
    • Failure to Diagnose
    • Failure to Monitor
    • Fall Injury Cases
    • Hospital Cases
    • Hospital Negligence
    • Medical Malpractice
    • News
    • Notable Cases
    • Nursing Home Abuse
    • Personal Injury
    • Wrongful Death
    • Contact Us * Required Fields

  • Schedule a free consultation * Required fields
  • Hidden

Dempsey Kingsland Osteen Logo
  • 1100 Main St
    #1860
    Kansas City, MO 64105
    Map & Directions

    Office Hours:
    M-F: 8:30 AM – 5:00 PM
    Sat: Closed
    Sun: Closed

816-421-6868

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Practice Areas
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • ©2023 Dempsey Kingsland Osteen
  •  | All Rights Reserved
  •  | Sitemap
Site By:
  • Contact Us for a Consultation Schedule your free consultation.

Accessibility Toolbar

  • Powered with favoriteLove by Codenroll